In the current research, both parents scored sure enough, which have ‘Rio Grande Russet’ appearing slightly before readiness ratings (5


In the current research, both parents scored sure enough, which have ‘Rio Grande Russet’ appearing slightly before readiness ratings (5

Vine readiness

‘Premier Russet’ has a late vine maturity and ‘Rio Grande Russet’ has a medium late maturity. 0–6.5) than ‘Premier Russet’ (6.0–7.5). For the progeny, mean trait values displayed a wide range of phenotypic variation (Additional file 4: Table S3), with a high correlation between years (> 0.70, P < 0.001) and across environments (> 0.55, P < 0.001). The broad-sense heritability for both years at each location was statistically significant, with H 2 estimates ranging from 0.83 to 0.93 (Table 2). These results were consistent for all vine maturity traits. When mean values for maturity were mapped to the linkage maps, a significant association was detected on chromosome 5 (Fig. 2, Additional file 6: Figure S2). This association was consistent between years and environments. Logarithm of the odds (LOD) scores ranged from of 21.2 and 34.1, well above the permutation thresholds. Collectively, they explained between 38 and 54% of the trait variance (Table 3). The peak of the LOD profile was consistently detected at 15.0 cM (Table 3, Fig. 2). The best simple model for maturity was a double-simplex configuration (AAAB ? AAAB) on homologous chromosomes H2 and H8 of Rio Grande russet (RGR) and Premier Russet (PR), respectively (Additional file 6: Figure S2). This model implies a QTL with allele effects from both parents, and with the B allele associated with earlier maturity (P < 0.001). Thus, progeny with two copies of the B allele (AABB) had on average earlier maturity (3.1–4.0) than progeny with a single copy (AAAB, 4.5–6.2) or lacking the B allele (AAAA, 6.4–7.5).

LOD get shipping off QTLs for attributes in the maturity locus region into the chromosome 5. For every committee regarding the profile is short for a different sort of feature. LOD threshold 95% trust periods try listed in Desk 3. Ca, citric acid 2010; EB, early blight; FBE, bud-avoid fry color Idaho; GH, progress routine; GLU, glucose; M95, vine readiness within 95DAP; M120, vine maturity within 120DAP; TSHA, tuber profile; VW, Verticillium wilt; ID, Idaho; NC, Vermont; DAP, days just after growing; wide variety 10 and you can eleven throughout the characteristic labels indicate years 2010 and you may 2011, correspondingly

The fresh new SNP nearest toward QTL for readiness that had a double-simplex configuration is actually solcap_snp_c2_11605, located at nine.step one cM. Regression of your own readiness indicate values into the genotype regarding the SNP informed me between 38 and you may 50% of your own phenotypic variance. This new height of the LOD contour (fifteen cM) was organized within a space between markers one to spanned 8 so you can 10 cM, on the solcap_snp_c2_11605 situated on one to region of the pit. This area ports the newest Solanum tuberosum cycling DOF basis gene step 1 (StCDF1, PGSC0003DMG400018408), that has been considered a primary regulator out of potato bush maturity . Visual image of your own hereditary and you may real (Mb) point away from homologous chromosomes H2 and you will H8 demonstrated the new requested curve contour and you will match better which have chromosome structure proving a leading knowledge of concordance within genetic reputation (cM) and you will real location (Mb) (Extra document 7: Contour S3).

Several characteristics co-localize at the maturity locus region into chromosome 5

Eight attributes in addition to citric acid (CANC10), progress habit (GHID, GHNC), bud-avoid fry color (FBEID), early blight get (EBID11), tuber sugar (GLUID11), tuber contour (TSHAID), and you may Verticillium wilt score (VWID11) co-local which have vine maturity traits (MAT95ID, MAT95NC, MAT120ID, MAT120NC) into chromosome 5 (Table 3, female escort in Abilene TX Fig. 2). An educated hereditary model for all traits, but GLUID11 and FBEID try a dual-simplex effect on H2 and H8 into the SNP, solcap_snp_c2_11605, with that it setup (Desk 3). In the event that residuals throughout the regression of all half a dozen faculties for the vine readiness was basically assessed, zero tall effect of a beneficial QTL was located getting EBID11, TSHAID, and GHNC. For growth habit (GHID) and VWID11, a significant QTL are observed on condition that fixed to possess readiness during the 95DAP but was not tall within 120DAP. Study out of glucose density (GLUID11) showed an effective LOD off step three.9 from the 21 cM, having a great QTL effect on H2 and you may H5. Immediately after changing to possess readiness, an optimum from the LOD bend getting GLUID11 try noticed only below the 95% permutation tolerance.

Leave a Reply